From: wtcqd2000 (CIAn9_11@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Dec 22 2001 - 19:15:49 EST
FAA and Department of Defense Procedures for "Standard Flight
Intercept Procedures" that "SHOULD've" occurred on 9-11 are sourced
with URL's below. IT'S SIMPLY CRAZY NOT TO LOOK INTO THIS NOW.
Below is a reprint of a letter Top_View sent to the White House. The
below detailed analysis, which includes FAA and Department of Defense
Procedures for Plane Interception, claims to be proof that Standard
Intercept Procedures on the morning of September 11th were thwarted
by a direct order for air defense to "stand down." This analysis
asserts that the "stand down" orders must have come from the Bush
Administration
This person's done some extensive research on how FAA regs of planes
to intercept were illegally thwarted. Also below are FAA regs on
Standard Procedure to intercept off course planes and past responses
to off course planes . . . leave a scathing indictment of whoever
ordered the "stand down" order. I ENCOURAGE ALL TO LOOK DEEPLY INTO
THIS ISSUE AND THEM MAKE UP THEIR OWN MINDS -- HOWEVER, THERE ARE
ENOUGH QUESTIONS TO WARRENT A FULL AND OPEN INQUIRY INTO THIS
MATTER!! How else can these questions be answered in any meaningful
way?
[To Join the Int'l Movement DEMANDING Inquiry into 9-11, request a
free Activist Kits, available by replying to findtruth40@hotmail.com
w/ "Send Kit".]
NOTE: ON THE "ACTIVIST KITS". WE HAVE PERSONALLY SENT OUT 10,000
ACTIVIST KITS. IF EACH OF YOU SENT OUT 100 THERE ARE NOW "ONE
MILLION" ACTIVIST KITS BEING USED AND DISTRIBUTED. IF EACH OF YOU
SENT OUT 1,000, THERE ARE NOW "TEN MILLION" ACTIVIST KITS BEING
DISTRIBUTED!! -- THE TIME TO ACT IS NOW! TOGETHER WE WILL BRING
THIS TO THE LIGHT.
From: TOP_VIEW <top_viewer@yahoo.com>
To: <president@whitehouse.gov>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:50 AM
Subject: ASK BUSH: WHY was air defense shut down on 9.11 AFTER
receiving ATC
alerts
> ** TOP_VIEW **
> The Big Picture
>
>
> 12.20.01
> ASK BUSH: WHY was air defense shut down on 9.11 AFTER receiving
> ATC alerts ** DOZENS of air bases within MINUTES of BOTH 9.11
targets!
>
>
>
> There is irrefutable evidence which proves total complicity on the
part of traitors at the highest level of the executive branch --
along with numerous accomplices and co-conspirators in the military,
intelligence and administrative sectors -- in the September 11
atrocities perpetrated against the American people
>
> Here's the deal.
>
> It is a FACT that DOZENS of Air Force and Air National Guard bases
are located within TEN to THIRTY minutes intercept time of BOTH 9.11
target locations.
>
> It is a FACT that most of these installations have at the ready
fighter jets such as F-16s to be scrambled on a MOMENT's NOTICE, for
> intercepting troubled or problem aircraft.
>
> It is a FACT that air defense units DID receive alerts from Air
Traffic Controllers and non-corrupt FAA officials on a number of
aircraft across the East Coast which had broken communications and
deviated radically from established flight paths on the morning of
September 11.
>
> It is a FACT that standard intercept procedures for dealing with
these kinds of situations ARE TOTALLY ESTABLISHED, IN FORCE and ON-
LINE in these United States 365 days a year, 7 days a week, 24 hours
a day.
>
> << Regarding rules governing IFR requirements, see FAA Order 7400.2E
> 'Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters,' Effective Date:
December 7,
> 2000 (Includes Change 1, effective July 7, 2001), Chapter 14-1-2.
> Full text posted at:
> http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/AIR/air1401.html#14-1-2FAA
>
> <<Guide to Basic Flight Information and Air Traffic Control (ATC)
> Procedures,' (Includes Change
> 3 Effective: July 12, 2001) Chapter 5-6-4 "Interception Signals"
> Full text posted at:
> http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/AIM/Chap5/aim0506.html#5-6-4
>
> <<FAA Order 7110.65M 'Air Traffic Control' (Includes Change 3
Effective:
> July 12, 2001), Chapter 10-2-5 "Emergency Situations"
> Full text posted at:
> http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/ATC/Chp10/atc1002.html#10-2-5
>
> <<FAA Order 7110.65M 'Air Traffic Control' (Includes Change 3
Effective:
> July 12, 2001), Chapter 10-1-1 "Emergency Determinations"
> Full text posted at:
> http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/ATC/Chp10/atc1001.html#10-1-1
>
> <<FAA Order 7610.4J 'Special Military Operations' (Effective Date:
> November 3, 1998; Includes: Change 1, effective July 3, 2000;
Change 2,
> effective July 12, 2001), Chapter 4, Section 5, "Air Defense Liaison
> Officers (ADLO's)"
> Full text posted at:
> http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/MIL/Ch4/mil0405.html#Section%205
>
> <<FAA Order 7610.4J 'Special Military Operations' (Effective Date:
> November 3, 1998; Includes: Change 1, effective July 3, 2000;
Change 2,
> effective July 12, 2001), Chapter 7, Section 1-2, "Escort of
Hijacked
> Aircraft: Requests for Service"
> Full text posted at:
> http://faa.gov/ATpubs/MIL/Ch7/mil0701.html#7-1-2
>
> <<'Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3610.01A,' 1
June
> 2001, "Aircraft Piracy (Hijacking) and Destruction of Derelict
Airborne
> Objects," 4. Policy (page 1)
> PDF available at:
> http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/cjcsd/cjcsi/3610_01a.pdf
> Backup at:
> http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/3610_01a.pdf
>
> <<For a clear and detailed description of flight plans, fixes, and
Air
> Traffic Control, see: 'Direct-To Requirements' by Gregory Dennis and
> Emina Torlak at:
> http://sdg.lcs.mit.edu/atc/D2Requirements.htm
>
>
> It is a FACT that Air National Guard and Air Force air defense
units of
> the United States WERE PROHIBITED from carrying out their STANDARD
> INTERCEPT PROCEDURES as detailed above on the morning of 9.11; AFTER
> they had received the alerts from ATC and FAA.
>
> Absolutely NO executive-level input of ANY KIND is required for
standard
> intercepts to be scrambled.
>
> There was NO indication in any alerts received by air defense units
that
> "SHOOT-DOWNS" may be required as opposed to intercepts -- i.e.; that
> the planes were definitely under control of "hostile" forces --
because
> ATC/FAA could NOT have KNOWN that.
>
> When the first alerts were received from Air Traffic Control, ALL
that
> air defense units were required to do was scramble STANDARD
interceptors
> to make contact with the incommunicado and off-course jets. F-16s
and
> other fighter planes WOULD HAVE overtaken EVERY SINGLE HIJACKED
PLANE on
> September 11, BEFORE they had reached their targets!
>
> IF, at the time of interception, it was determined the aircraft were
> under hostile control and likely to impact targets, high-level air
> defense commanders at the Pentagon's National Military Command
Center
> (NMCC) are FULLY AUTHORIZED under existing and established
regulations
> and procedures to authorize a shoot-down,. in order to PROTECT THE
> UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM ATTACK.
>
> Yet air defense units that were READY AND WAITING on 9.11 at DOZENS
of
> nearby installations were ordered NOT to scramble interceptors: they
> were ordered to stand down from carrying out even the FIRST STAGE of
> STANDARD INTERCEPT PROCEDURES.
>
> These orders came from the executive office of then president as
well
> as from complicit traitors in the aforementioned NMCC.
>
> There is NO QUESTION that if these interceptors had been scrambled
AT
> THE TIME alerts were received, they would have intercepted the
> hijacked planes before targets were approached IN EVERY INSTANCE.
>
> And there is NO WAY that the office of the President or the NMCC
could
> have KNOWN through any standard means that these incommunicado
flights
> required anything OTHER than standard interceptions, because ATC
and FAA
> alerts DID NOT relay any such information. The alerts simply
requested
> that STANDARD INTERCEPT PROCEDURES be implemented and that
interceptors
> be scrambled forthwith.
>
> Some disingenuous excuse-makers say things like: "Well, there was
no air
> defense response because the U.S. had NO PROCEDURES for dealing with
> such 'attacks,' because the U.S. had never BEEN 'attacked' this way
> before.'
>
> This sheer, complete nonsense: fully established procedures for
dealing
> with intercepts of ALL KINDS, including of hostile aircraft,
existed on
> Spetmeber 11, as detailed above.
>
> Furthermore: when those first alerts were received from ATC/FAA,
there
> was no MENTION of any "attack" and no NEED for "unusual" procedures.
> There was only a need for STANDARD, FIRST-STAGE INTERCEPTIONS to be
> scrambled, and higher authorities PREVENTED that.
>
> Other disingenuous excuse-makers THEN say: "Well, of COURSE higher
> authorities stepped in, because they had to see what was going on
with
> the whole situation, as 'America was under attack.' "
>
> AGAIN: America was NOT "under attack" when those first alerts were
> received; certainly ATC and FAA had NO WAy of knowing so early in
the
> proceedings that the jets which had broken communications and gone
> off-course were part of any "attack."
>
> So WHY did the executive branch and high-level military authorities
> DELIBERATELY order the air defense interceptors to STAND DOWN?
NOBODY
> could have known that early in the proceedings that 'America was
under
> attack"... or COULD they have known?
>
> OBVIOUSLY, those who ordered the stand-down DID know that early in
the
> proceedings that "America was under attack" because they were WHOLLY
> COMPLICIT in the attack, and took ALL POSSIBLE STEPS to ENSURE that
the
> attack WOULD TAKE PLACE, unimpeded by the air defense of the United
States.
>
> TRAITORS, TRAITORS, TRAITORS, each and every one of them. They
deserve
> the most severe punishment imaginable for their horrendous,
merciless
> horrific treachery and butchery of American citizens on that day.
TRUE
> patriots in this land who have SWORN to protect and defend our
Republic
> MUST BRING THESE ARCH-TRAITORS TO JUSTICE NOW!!!!!
> = = = =
> PILOT: bush's intercept stand-down orders on 9.11 were HIGH TREASON
>
> From: AC
> Subject: USAF ON 11/9/01
> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 02:19:23 -0600
>
>
> As i may have told you long ago, i am a tyro at questioning the
state.
> and such a task is not my principal activity. i am a small,
specialty
> manufacturer who has gotten caught up in being disgusted by my
> government's lies. and that has caused me to look at certain events
more
> closely than those who are thought to be responsible for that
scrutiny.
>
> as you know by now, i have also been outraged by the monstrous lies
that
> the government has foisted on the public, with the cooperation of
the
> press, concerning the failure of the us military to interdict and
> prevent the murderously damaging conclusion of 3 or 4 commercial
> airliners on 11/9/01.
>
> just by searching NYT archives, i found the policy and the
methodology
> for intercepting a runaway Lear 35[Payne Stewart's charter]. the
story
> clearly establishes that F16's were scrambled to intercept this
bizjet
> within 25 minutes of its failure to report to controllers upon its
> reaching its cleared alttitude of 39,000 ft. These F16's were
scrambled
> just upon the loss of a radio communication: the transponder never
> ceased to function.
>
> the way i view the intercept, the F16 out of Eglin, 500 miles
behind the
> lear 35, travelling at its posted max speed, mach 2+, caught the
lear 35
> in 30 minutes.
>
> for all of us who care about relating how the coup was facilitated,
and
> care to reveal 11/9/01 as a coup for posterity, then it seems to me
> essential that this technical record be established...a F16 can
catch a
> 767 within 30 minutes[if it is ordered to do so].
>
> with that understanding, since no one else has done it, i thought it
> would be of interest to see how many air force[including air
national
> guard, air force reserve] facilities might have been within 500
miles of
> the "terror" airliners on 11/9/01.
>
> here are the facilities that i found on the USAF website[s].
>
> 1. Andrews AFB[11 miles SE of DC]
>
> 2. Bolling AFB[3 miles south of US CAPITOL].
>
> 3. Dover AFB[3 miles southeast of Dover, Delaware]
>
> 4. Hanscom AFB[17 miles northwest of Boston]
>
> 5. Langley AFB[3 miles north of Hampton, VA]
>
> 6. McGuire AFB[18 miles southeast of Trenton,NJ]
>
> these are the major, active AIR FORCE facilities that could have
> launched intercepts with the commandeered airliners. all of them, if
> ordered in a timely fashion, could have intercepted and prevented
the
> collisions with the WTC and the Pentagon.
>
> then there are these minor, active AIR FORCE facilities. i don't
know
> how they function, but for the sake of history, let us note their
> existence within the umbrella of intercept before any collision with
> civilans could occur.
>
> 7. Cape Cod, MA AFS
>
> 8. New Boston, NH AFS
>
> and then there are the AIR NATIONAL GUARD and AIR FORCE RESERVE
BASES.
>
> 9. Atlantic City Airport, NJ[10 miles west of Atlantic City]
>
> 10. Barnes Municipal Airport, MA[3 miles northwest of Westfield]
>
> 11. Bradley International Airport, Conn[Windsor Locks]
>
> 12. Byrd Field, VA[4 miles southeast of Richmond]
>
> 13. Eastern West Virginia Regional Airport[4 miles south of
Martinsburg]
>
> 14. Frances S. Gabreski Airport, NY[Westhampton Beach]
>
> 15. Greater Pittsburgh International Airport, PA[15 miles nw of
Pittsburgh]
>
> 16. Harrisburg International Airport, PA[10 miles east of
Harrisburg]
>
> 17. Martin State Airport, MD[8 miles east of Baltimore] 18. New
Castle
> County Airport, DE[5 miles south of Wilmington]
>
> 19. Otis ANGB, MA[7 miles northeast of Falmouth]
>
> 20. Pease ANGS, NH[Portsmouth]
>
> 21. Quonset State Airport, RI[Providence]
>
> 22. Rickenbacker ANGB, OH[Columbus, Oh]
>
> 23. Stewart International Airport, NY[Newburgh, NY]
>
> 24. Westover ARB, MA[5 miles northeast of Chicopee]
>
> 25. Willow Grove Naval Air Station, PA[14 miles north of
Philadelphia]
>
> 26 Yeager Airport, WVA[4 miles northeast of Charleston]
>
> 27. Youngstown-Warren Regional Airport ARS, OH[16 miles north of
Youngstown]
>
> i am not so naive as to think that all of these installations were
> prepared to put up intercept, take-down aircraft that morning. but
some
> number of them may have been able to do that.
>
> and the question has to be, why didn't they? because all that were
> prepared to intercept and terminate could have done so. what
prevented
> them from even launching intercept aircraft?
>
> that is the question. have we just watched a 7 DAYS IN MAY?
wouldn't you
> like to see the orders that caused all of these aircraft to stand
down?
>
> i sure would. because based on the Payne Stewart story, such orders
had
> to have been given. as has been admitted, the automatic response
would
> ordinarily be to intercept and to shoot down.
>
> and based on the Payne Stewart story, we can only conclude that the
> resident of the USA, GEORGE WALKER BUSH, prevented the intercept and
> shootdown of the terrorist-commandeered airliners.
>
> can that be viewed as anything other than treason?
>
> there, i have said it. anyone care to contest that appraisal? i
invite
> the argument.
>
> i regret that i gave you some reason to doubt the thoroughness of my
thinking.
>
> wishing you a peaceful holiday season,
>
> ace
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Send FREE Holiday eCards from Yahoo! Greetings.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/IgTaHA/ZQdDAA/ySSFAA/BGfwlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
USAS webpage: http://www.usasnet.org
Unsubscribe from USAS list:
email blank message to usas-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 28 2002 - 02:52:32 EST